Aplicativo SoulMatcher

Write an honest profile that includes three specific interests, one clear value, and a direct invitation to start a conversation.

Openers should demand detail: reference a recent read, a travel memory, or a daily habit, and avoid generic greetings that invite minimal replies.

Set a disciplined message cadence: commit to an authentic reply within 24 hours, send a thoughtful follow-up within another 24 hours if interest remains, and prune chats lacking momentum after 48 hours.

Use built-in filters and metrics to refine prompts: track average reply length, response timee sentiment cues, then adjust prompts monthly.

Prioritize safety and authenticity with clear photo guidelines, verified details, and a commitment to respectful exchanges that skip empty profiles.

Prompt-driven conversations: tailored questions that reveal values, interests, and communication style

Start with a value-focused prompt: “What three principles guide your daily choices?”

Adopt a prompt library organized by aim: values, interests, communication style; build a four-question routine to surface depth in each area: 1) values, 2) interests, 3) tone, 4) conflict approach.

Values prompts drive honesty. Examples: “Which experience reshaped your view on fairness?” “Which principle would you defend under scrutiny?” “Describe a time you acted on principle even when it created friction.”

Interests prompts reveal what energizes a partner outside routine life. Examples: “What hobby would you pursue this year if time were unlimited?” “Which book or film sparked a new habit?” “Describe a weekend project you would tackle.”

Communication style prompts reveal how someone prefers dialogue. Examples: “When expressing disagreement, what tone helps you stay constructive?” “Do you favor direct messages, phone calls, or face-to-face chats?” “How soon after a plan shifts should you resync on next steps?”

Tip: mix prompts across surfaces: short prompts to guide initial chats, longer prompts to deepen dialogue. Track responses with a simple rubric: depth (0-5), specificity (0-5), emotional clarity (0-5).

Tailor prompts to personality: introverts prefer reflective prompts; extroverts enjoy prompts that invite witty exchange or quick storytelling. Use a cadence: two value prompts, two interest prompts, one style prompt per session. Rotate weekly to avoid stagnation.

Implementation tips: save high-performing prompts into a favorites set, assign tags, and run A/B prompts to surface responses across profiles with similar goals. Collect feedback on flow, adjust wording after each release.

Ethics: secure consent before deep prompts; allow opt-out; keep responses private until both sides consent to visibility; use anonymized data for analytics only.

Key metrics to monitor: target response length 60–120 words per reply; sentiment balance; topic diversity; and the ratio of value-driven prompts to interest prompts. Track completion rate, response quality, and time to first substantive reply. Review weekly and recalibrate prompts toward clearer values alignment, not superficial traits.

Operational cadence: a 10-minute daily prompt sprint, two value prompts, one interest prompt, one style prompt; log outcomes in a simple sheet to guide future prompts.

Values-based profiles and signals: practical indicators to compare compatibility at a glance

Recomendação: Start with a three-signal snapshot that users can skim in seconds: core values alignment, daily rhythm compatibility, and communication style.

Core values alignment: Look for explicit listing of values such as honesty, respect, autonomy, family priorities, or service orientation. Check for congruence between stated values and demonstrated behavior–e.g., value transparency, punctuality in commitments, and responsiveness to concerns. Score each value 1–5 based on clarity, specificity, and consistency across conversations; treat 4–5 as solid alignment, 2–3 as developing, 1 as misalignment.

Lifestyle compatibility: Compare sleep schedule, work hours, weekend routines, travel willingness. Signals: preference for early riser vs night owl, routine vs spontaneity, cost of living expectations. Use a quick 3-point check: sleep alignment (same wake time within one hour), social cadence (weekly date nights), and travel openness (one international trip per year).

Communication style: Assess tone, directness, conflict approach. Indicators: frequency of check-ins, use of calming language, readiness to apologize, how disagreements are framed. Quick scoring: directness 1–5; responsiveness 1–5; conflict approach 1–5.

Trust signals at a glance: Consistency across prompts, scenarios, and responses matters more than a single virtuous sentence. Look for recurring commitments, specific examples, and avoidance of vague terms. Red flags include evasive answers, selective disclosure, or shifting narratives across chats.

Profile construction tips: Include a three-value cluster with a short descriptor for each item, attach a 1–5 scale, and show the average next to the cluster. Example clusters: “Honesty and transparency” with descriptor “consistently clear,” “Autonomy linked with responsibility” descriptor “independent yet accountable,” “Pace of life alignment” descriptor “scheduling compatible.” Use explicit prompts such as: “Describe a situation where you had to compromise on a core value,” “What does a typical weekend look like,” “How do you handle disagreements.” Record scores beside each value to enable quick cross-check.

Safety, authenticity, and engagement tools: verification, moderation, and honest icebreakers

Recomendação: Implemente um fluxo de verificação em camadas combinando verificações automatizadas de identidade, sinais de vivacidade e revisão humana opcional; exiba uma pontuação de confiança visível nos cartões de perfil; proteja ações confidenciais atrás do status verificado; forneça um processo de apelação transparente.

As metas de desempenho para o lançamento inicial incluem melhorias mensuráveis em três domínios:

• Perfis falsos detectados por verificações automatizadas diminuem 28% nos primeiros três meses.
• O tempo médio de resolução da fila de moderação é de 6 horas; casos fora do horário comercial são tratados por triagem com rápida escalada para humanos.
• Aumentos de confiança relatados pelos usuários; a pontuação mediana de confiança aumenta em 12 pontos; a satisfação geral melhora em 9%.
• A mensagem converte após mensagens honestas, com um aumento de 18% nas respostas a iniciadores de conversa genuínos.

Arquitetura de verificação:

• Camada de identidade: verificação opcional de ID governamental, "selfie liveness" e correspondência facial; etiquetas de risco rotuladas como baixo, médio, alto; alto risco aciona verificações secundárias ou revisão humana.
• Integridade do dispositivo e da sessão: impressão digital do dispositivo, alertas de login incomuns, monitoramento da estabilidade da sessão; anomalias geram avisos de segurança ou reautenticação.
• Análise comportamental: a detecção de padrões sinaliza incompatibilidades entre o texto da bio, os interesses e a atividade; a escalada ocorre quando os limites de risco são ultrapassados.

Estrutura de moderação:

• Triagem assistida por IA com humano no circuito; sinalização em tempo real de conteúdo que viola políticas; registros de contexto completos para revisores; trilha de auditoria inviolável.
• Controles de segurança da comunidade: opção de denúncia rápida; opções para bloquear, silenciar ou restringir interações; bloqueios leves automatizados após violações repetidas.
• Canal de recursos: usuários enviam evidências; decisões revisadas em 24 horas; critérios claros e publicados orientam os resultados.

Kit de quebra-gelos honestos:

1. Valores primeiro: “Descreva um momento em que um valor fundamental guiou uma escolha.”
2. Experiências que moldam visões: “Compartilhe uma experiência que alterou sua perspectiva sobre relacionamentos.”
3. Perguntas da curiosidade: “Que pergunta você faria a alguém que você mais admira?”
4. Observações neutras: “Que pequeno gesto de outra pessoa alegrou o seu dia ultimamente?”
5. Enquadramento do futuro: "Onde espera estar no próximo ano, pessoal e socialmente?"