App SoulMatcher

Write an honest profile that includes three specific interests, one clear value, and a direct invitation to start a conversation.

Openers should demand detail: reference a recent read, a travel memory, or a daily habit, and avoid generic greetings that invite minimal replies.

Set a disciplined message cadence: commit to an authentic reply within 24 hours, send a thoughtful follow-up within another 24 hours if interest remains, and prune chats lacking momentum after 48 hours.

Use built-in filters and metrics to refine prompts: track average reply length, response time, e sentiment cues, then adjust prompts monthly.

Prioritize safety and authenticity with clear photo guidelines, verified details, and a commitment to respectful exchanges that skip empty profiles.

Prompt-driven conversations: tailored questions that reveal values, interests, and communication style

Start with a value-focused prompt: “What three principles guide your daily choices?”

Adopt a prompt library organized by aim: values, interests, communication style; build a four-question routine to surface depth in each area: 1) values, 2) interests, 3) tone, 4) conflict approach.

Values prompts drive honesty. Examples: “Which experience reshaped your view on fairness?” “Which principle would you defend under scrutiny?” “Describe a time you acted on principle even when it created friction.”

Interests prompts reveal what energizes a partner outside routine life. Examples: “What hobby would you pursue this year if time were unlimited?” “Which book or film sparked a new habit?” “Describe a weekend project you would tackle.”

Communication style prompts reveal how someone prefers dialogue. Examples: “When expressing disagreement, what tone helps you stay constructive?” “Do you favor direct messages, phone calls, or face-to-face chats?” “How soon after a plan shifts should you resync on next steps?”

Tip: mix prompts across surfaces: short prompts to guide initial chats, longer prompts to deepen dialogue. Track responses with a simple rubric: depth (0-5), specificity (0-5), emotional clarity (0-5).

Tailor prompts to personality: introverts prefer reflective prompts; extroverts enjoy prompts that invite witty exchange or quick storytelling. Use a cadence: two value prompts, two interest prompts, one style prompt per session. Rotate weekly to avoid stagnation.

Implementation tips: save high-performing prompts into a favorites set, assign tags, and run A/B prompts to surface responses across profiles with similar goals. Collect feedback on flow, adjust wording after each release.

Ethics: secure consent before deep prompts; allow opt-out; keep responses private until both sides consent to visibility; use anonymized data for analytics only.

Key metrics to monitor: target response length 60–120 words per reply; sentiment balance; topic diversity; and the ratio of value-driven prompts to interest prompts. Track completion rate, response quality, and time to first substantive reply. Review weekly and recalibrate prompts toward clearer values alignment, not superficial traits.

Operational cadence: a 10-minute daily prompt sprint, two value prompts, one interest prompt, one style prompt; log outcomes in a simple sheet to guide future prompts.

Values-based profiles and signals: practical indicators to compare compatibility at a glance

Raccomandazione: Start with a three-signal snapshot that users can skim in seconds: core values alignment, daily rhythm compatibility, and communication style.

Core values alignment: Look for explicit listing of values such as honesty, respect, autonomy, family priorities, or service orientation. Check for congruence between stated values and demonstrated behavior–e.g., value transparency, punctuality in commitments, and responsiveness to concerns. Score each value 1–5 based on clarity, specificity, and consistency across conversations; treat 4–5 as solid alignment, 2–3 as developing, 1 as misalignment.

Lifestyle compatibility: Compare sleep schedule, work hours, weekend routines, travel willingness. Signals: preference for early riser vs night owl, routine vs spontaneity, cost of living expectations. Use a quick 3-point check: sleep alignment (same wake time within one hour), social cadence (weekly date nights), and travel openness (one international trip per year).

Communication style: Assess tone, directness, conflict approach. Indicators: frequency of check-ins, use of calming language, readiness to apologize, how disagreements are framed. Quick scoring: directness 1–5; responsiveness 1–5; conflict approach 1–5.

Trust signals at a glance: Consistency across prompts, scenarios, and responses matters more than a single virtuous sentence. Look for recurring commitments, specific examples, and avoidance of vague terms. Red flags include evasive answers, selective disclosure, or shifting narratives across chats.

Profile construction tips: Include a three-value cluster with a short descriptor for each item, attach a 1–5 scale, and show the average next to the cluster. Example clusters: “Honesty and transparency” with descriptor “consistently clear,” “Autonomy linked with responsibility” descriptor “independent yet accountable,” “Pace of life alignment” descriptor “scheduling compatible.” Use explicit prompts such as: “Describe a situation where you had to compromise on a core value,” “What does a typical weekend look like,” “How do you handle disagreements.” Record scores beside each value to enable quick cross-check.

Safety, authenticity, and engagement tools: verification, moderation, and honest icebreakers

Raccomandazione: implementare un flusso di verifica a più livelli che combini controlli automatici dell'identità, segnali di vitalità e revisione umana opzionale; visualizzare un punteggio di affidabilità visibile sulle schede profilo; controllare le azioni sensibili dietro lo stato verificato; fornire un processo di appello trasparente.

I target di performance per l'implementazione iniziale includono miglioramenti misurabili in tre aree:

• I profili falsi rilevati dai controlli automatizzati diminuiscono del 28% nei primi tre mesi.
• Il tempo medio di risoluzione della coda di moderazione è di 6 ore; i casi al di fuori dell'orario di lavoro vengono gestiti tramite triage con rapida escalation a personale umano.
• Aumenta la fiducia segnalata dagli utenti; il punteggio medio di fiducia sale di 12 punti; la soddisfazione complessiva migliora del 91%.
• La messaggistica converte dopo sollecitazioni oneste, con un aumento del 181% nelle risposte a spunti di conversazione genuini.

Architettura di verifica:

• Livello identità: verifica facoltativa dell'ID governativo, rilevamento della vitalità tramite selfie e corrispondenza facciale; tag di rischio etichettati come basso, medio, alto; l'alto rischio attiva controlli secondari o revisione umana.
• Integrità del dispositivo e della sessione: fingerprinting del dispositivo, avvisi di accesso insoliti, monitoraggio della stabilità della sessione; le anomalie richiedono prompt sicuri o riautenticazione.
• Analisi comportamentale: il rilevamento di pattern segnala incongruenze tra il testo della biografia, gli interessi e l'attività; l'escalation si verifica quando vengono superate le soglie di rischio.

Framework di moderazione:

• Triage assistito dall'IA con supervisione umana; segnalazione in tempo reale di contenuti che violano le policy; log di contesto completi per i revisori; audit trail a prova di manomissione.
• Controlli per la sicurezza della community: opzione di segnalazione rapida; opzioni per bloccare, silenziare o limitare le interazioni; soft block automatici dopo ripetute violazioni.
• Canale di appello: gli utenti presentano prove; le decisioni vengono riviste entro 24 ore; criteri chiari e pubblicati guidano i risultati.

Kit di strumenti per rompere il ghiaccio onesti:

1. Valori prima di tutto: “Descrivi un momento in cui un valore fondamentale ha guidato una scelta”.
2. Esperienze che plasmano le opinioni: "Condividi un'esperienza che ha modificato la tua prospettiva sulle relazioni."
3. Spunti di curiosità: "Quale domanda faresti a qualcuno che ammiri di più?"
4. Osservazioni neutrali: "Quale piccolo gesto da parte di un'altra persona ha illuminato la tua giornata ultimamente?"
5. Definizione del futuro: "Dove speri di essere l'anno prossimo, a livello personale e sociale?"