...
Blog

Application SoulMatcher

Psychologie
septembre 04, 2022
Application SoulMatcherApplication SoulMatcher">

Write an honest profile that includes three specific interests, one clear value, and a direct invitation to start a conversation.

Openers should demand detail: reference a recent read, a travel memory, or a daily habit, and avoid generic greetings that invite minimal replies.

Set a disciplined message cadence: commit to an authentic reply within 24 hours, send a thoughtful follow-up within another 24 hours if interest remains, and prune chats lacking momentum after 48 hours.

Use built-in filters and metrics to refine prompts: track average reply length, response timeet sentiment cues, then adjust prompts monthly.

Prioritize safety and authenticity with clear photo guidelines, verified details, and a commitment to respectful exchanges that skip empty profiles.

Prompt-driven conversations: tailored questions that reveal values, interests, and communication style

Start with a value-focused prompt: “What three principles guide your daily choices?”

Adopt a prompt library organized by aim: values, interests, communication style; build a four-question routine to surface depth in each area: 1) values, 2) interests, 3) tone, 4) conflict approach.

Values prompts drive honesty. Examples: “Which experience reshaped your view on fairness?” “Which principle would you defend under scrutiny?” “Describe a time you acted on principle even when it created friction.”

Interests prompts reveal what energizes a partner outside routine life. Examples: “What hobby would you pursue this year if time were unlimited?” “Which book or film sparked a new habit?” “Describe a weekend project you would tackle.”

Communication style prompts reveal how someone prefers dialogue. Examples: “When expressing disagreement, what tone helps you stay constructive?” “Do you favor direct messages, phone calls, or face-to-face chats?” “How soon after a plan shifts should you resync on next steps?”

Tip: mix prompts across surfaces: short prompts to guide initial chats, longer prompts to deepen dialogue. Track responses with a simple rubric: depth (0-5), specificity (0-5), emotional clarity (0-5).

Tailor prompts to personality: introverts prefer reflective prompts; extroverts enjoy prompts that invite witty exchange or quick storytelling. Use a cadence: two value prompts, two interest prompts, one style prompt per session. Rotate weekly to avoid stagnation.

Implementation tips: save high-performing prompts into a favorites set, assign tags, and run A/B prompts to surface responses across profiles with similar goals. Collect feedback on flow, adjust wording after each release.

Ethics: secure consent before deep prompts; allow opt-out; keep responses private until both sides consent to visibility; use anonymized data for analytics only.

Key metrics to monitor: target response length 60–120 words per reply; sentiment balance; topic diversity; and the ratio of value-driven prompts to interest prompts. Track completion rate, response quality, and time to first substantive reply. Review weekly and recalibrate prompts toward clearer values alignment, not superficial traits.

Operational cadence: a 10-minute daily prompt sprint, two value prompts, one interest prompt, one style prompt; log outcomes in a simple sheet to guide future prompts.

Values-based profiles and signals: practical indicators to compare compatibility at a glance

Values-based profiles and signals: practical indicators to compare compatibility at a glance

Recommandation: Start with a three-signal snapshot that users can skim in seconds: core values alignment, daily rhythm compatibility, and communication style.

Core values alignment: Look for explicit listing of values such as honesty, respect, autonomy, family priorities, or service orientation. Check for congruence between stated values and demonstrated behavior–e.g., value transparency, punctuality in commitments, and responsiveness to concerns. Score each value 1–5 based on clarity, specificity, and consistency across conversations; treat 4–5 as solid alignment, 2–3 as developing, 1 as misalignment.

Lifestyle compatibility: Compare sleep schedule, work hours, weekend routines, travel willingness. Signals: preference for early riser vs night owl, routine vs spontaneity, cost of living expectations. Use a quick 3-point check: sleep alignment (same wake time within one hour), social cadence (weekly date nights), and travel openness (one international trip per year).

Communication style: Assess tone, directness, conflict approach. Indicators: frequency of check-ins, use of calming language, readiness to apologize, how disagreements are framed. Quick scoring: directness 1–5; responsiveness 1–5; conflict approach 1–5.

Trust signals at a glance: Consistency across prompts, scenarios, and responses matters more than a single virtuous sentence. Look for recurring commitments, specific examples, and avoidance of vague terms. Red flags include evasive answers, selective disclosure, or shifting narratives across chats.

Profile construction tips: Include a three-value cluster with a short descriptor for each item, attach a 1–5 scale, and show the average next to the cluster. Example clusters: “Honesty and transparency” with descriptor “consistently clear,” “Autonomy linked with responsibility” descriptor “independent yet accountable,” “Pace of life alignment” descriptor “scheduling compatible.” Use explicit prompts such as: “Describe a situation where you had to compromise on a core value,” “What does a typical weekend look like,” “How do you handle disagreements.” Record scores beside each value to enable quick cross-check.

Safety, authenticity, and engagement tools: verification, moderation, and honest icebreakers

Recommendation: Deploy a layered verification flow combining automated identity checks, liveness signals, and optional human review; display a visible trust score on profile cards; gate sensitive actions behind verified status; provide a transparent appeals process.

Les objectifs de performance pour le déploiement initial comprennent des améliorations mesurables dans trois domaines :

  • Le nombre de faux profils détectés par les contrôles automatisés diminue de 28% au cours des trois premiers mois.
  • Le temps de résolution de la file d'attente de modération est en moyenne de 6 heures ; les cas hors des heures de bureau sont traités par triage avec une escalade rapide vers des humains.
  • L'indice de confiance rapporté par les utilisateurs augmente ; le score de confiance médian augmente de 12 points ; la satisfaction globale s'améliore de 9%.
  • La messagerie convertit après des invites honnêtes, avec une augmentation de 18% des réponses aux amorces de conversation authentiques.

Architecture de vérification :

  • Couche d'identité : vérification facultative de la pièce d'identité par le gouvernement, test de vivacité par selfie et correspondance faciale ; balises de risque étiquetées faible, moyen, élevé ; risque élevé déclenche des contrôles secondaires ou un examen humain.
  • Intégrité de l'appareil et de la session : empreinte digitale de l'appareil, alertes de connexion inhabituelles, surveillance de la stabilité de la session ; les anomalies déclenchent des invites sécurisées ou une réauthentification.
  • Analyse comportementale : la détection de schémas signale les discordances entre le texte bio, les intérêts et l’activité ; l’escalade se produit lorsque les seuils de risque sont dépassés.

Cadre de modération :

  • Tri assisté par l'IA avec intervention humaine ; signalement en temps réel du contenu violant la politique ; journaux de contexte complets pour les réviseurs ; piste d'audit inviolable.
  • Contrôles de sécurité communautaire : option de signalement rapide ; options de blocage, de mise en sourdine ou de restriction des interactions ; blocages temporaires automatisés après violations répétées.
  • Voie de recours : les utilisateurs soumettent des preuves ; les décisions sont réexaminées dans les 24 heures ; des critères clairs et publiés guident les résultats.

Boîte à outils de brise-glace honnêtes :

  1. Les valeurs d'abord : « Décrivez un moment où une valeur fondamentale a guidé un choix. »
  2. Expériences qui façonnent les opinions : « Partagez une expérience qui a modifié votre point de vue sur les relations. »
  3. Invite à la curiosité : « Quelle question poseriez-vous à quelqu'un que vous admirez le plus ? »
  4. Observations neutres : « Quel petit geste d'une autre personne a illuminé votre journée récemment ? »
  5. Cadrage futur : « Où espérez-vous être l'année prochaine, personnellement et socialement ? »
Plus d'informations sur le sujet Psychologie
S'inscrire au cours