...
Blog

Aplicación SoulMatcher

Psicología
septiembre 04, 2022
Aplicación SoulMatcherAplicación SoulMatcher">

Write an honest profile that includes three specific interests, one clear value, and a direct invitation to start a conversation.

Openers should demand detail: reference a recent read, a travel memory, or a daily habit, and avoid generic greetings that invite minimal replies.

Set a disciplined message cadence: commit to an authentic reply within 24 hours, send a thoughtful follow-up within another 24 hours if interest remains, and prune chats lacking momentum after 48 hours.

Use built-in filters and metrics to refine prompts: track average reply length, response timey sentiment cues, then adjust prompts monthly.

Prioritize safety and authenticity with clear photo guidelines, verified details, and a commitment to respectful exchanges that skip empty profiles.

Prompt-driven conversations: tailored questions that reveal values, interests, and communication style

Start with a value-focused prompt: “What three principles guide your daily choices?”

Adopt a prompt library organized by aim: values, interests, communication style; build a four-question routine to surface depth in each area: 1) values, 2) interests, 3) tone, 4) conflict approach.

Values prompts drive honesty. Examples: “Which experience reshaped your view on fairness?” “Which principle would you defend under scrutiny?” “Describe a time you acted on principle even when it created friction.”

Interests prompts reveal what energizes a partner outside routine life. Examples: “What hobby would you pursue this year if time were unlimited?” “Which book or film sparked a new habit?” “Describe a weekend project you would tackle.”

Communication style prompts reveal how someone prefers dialogue. Examples: “When expressing disagreement, what tone helps you stay constructive?” “Do you favor direct messages, phone calls, or face-to-face chats?” “How soon after a plan shifts should you resync on next steps?”

Tip: mix prompts across surfaces: short prompts to guide initial chats, longer prompts to deepen dialogue. Track responses with a simple rubric: depth (0-5), specificity (0-5), emotional clarity (0-5).

Tailor prompts to personality: introverts prefer reflective prompts; extroverts enjoy prompts that invite witty exchange or quick storytelling. Use a cadence: two value prompts, two interest prompts, one style prompt per session. Rotate weekly to avoid stagnation.

Implementation tips: save high-performing prompts into a favorites set, assign tags, and run A/B prompts to surface responses across profiles with similar goals. Collect feedback on flow, adjust wording after each release.

Ethics: secure consent before deep prompts; allow opt-out; keep responses private until both sides consent to visibility; use anonymized data for analytics only.

Key metrics to monitor: target response length 60–120 words per reply; sentiment balance; topic diversity; and the ratio of value-driven prompts to interest prompts. Track completion rate, response quality, and time to first substantive reply. Review weekly and recalibrate prompts toward clearer values alignment, not superficial traits.

Operational cadence: a 10-minute daily prompt sprint, two value prompts, one interest prompt, one style prompt; log outcomes in a simple sheet to guide future prompts.

Values-based profiles and signals: practical indicators to compare compatibility at a glance

Values-based profiles and signals: practical indicators to compare compatibility at a glance

Recomendación: Start with a three-signal snapshot that users can skim in seconds: core values alignment, daily rhythm compatibility, and communication style.

Core values alignment: Look for explicit listing of values such as honesty, respect, autonomy, family priorities, or service orientation. Check for congruence between stated values and demonstrated behavior–e.g., value transparency, punctuality in commitments, and responsiveness to concerns. Score each value 1–5 based on clarity, specificity, and consistency across conversations; treat 4–5 as solid alignment, 2–3 as developing, 1 as misalignment.

Lifestyle compatibility: Compare sleep schedule, work hours, weekend routines, travel willingness. Signals: preference for early riser vs night owl, routine vs spontaneity, cost of living expectations. Use a quick 3-point check: sleep alignment (same wake time within one hour), social cadence (weekly date nights), and travel openness (one international trip per year).

Communication style: Assess tone, directness, conflict approach. Indicators: frequency of check-ins, use of calming language, readiness to apologize, how disagreements are framed. Quick scoring: directness 1–5; responsiveness 1–5; conflict approach 1–5.

Trust signals at a glance: Consistency across prompts, scenarios, and responses matters more than a single virtuous sentence. Look for recurring commitments, specific examples, and avoidance of vague terms. Red flags include evasive answers, selective disclosure, or shifting narratives across chats.

Profile construction tips: Include a three-value cluster with a short descriptor for each item, attach a 1–5 scale, and show the average next to the cluster. Example clusters: “Honesty and transparency” with descriptor “consistently clear,” “Autonomy linked with responsibility” descriptor “independent yet accountable,” “Pace of life alignment” descriptor “scheduling compatible.” Use explicit prompts such as: “Describe a situation where you had to compromise on a core value,” “What does a typical weekend look like,” “How do you handle disagreements.” Record scores beside each value to enable quick cross-check.

Safety, authenticity, and engagement tools: verification, moderation, and honest icebreakers

Recomendación: Implemente un flujo de verificación en capas que combine comprobaciones de identidad automatizadas, señales de vitalidad y revisión humana opcional; muestre una puntuación de confianza visible en las tarjetas de perfil; proteja las acciones confidenciales detrás del estado verificado; proporcione un proceso de apelaciones transparente.

Los objetivos de rendimiento para el despliegue inicial incluyen mejoras medibles en tres dominios:

  • Los perfiles falsos detectados por controles automatizados disminuyen en un 28% en los primeros tres meses.
  • El tiempo promedio de resolución en la cola de moderación es de 6 horas; los casos fuera de horario son gestionados por triaje con una rápida escalada a humanos.
  • Aumenta la confianza según los usuarios; la puntuación media de confianza sube 12 puntos; la satisfacción general mejora en un 91%.
  • La mensajería convierte después de indicaciones honestas, con un aumento del 18% en las respuestas a los iniciadores de conversación genuinos.

Arquitectura de verificación:

  • Capa de identidad: verificación opcional de identificación gubernamental, prueba de vida de selfie y coincidencia facial; etiquetas de riesgo etiquetadas como bajas, medias, altas; el alto riesgo activa verificaciones secundarias o revisión humana.
  • Integridad del dispositivo y la sesión: huella digital del dispositivo, alertas de inicio de sesión inusuales, supervisión de la estabilidad de la sesión; las anomalías provocan avisos de seguridad o reautenticación.
  • Analítica del comportamiento: la detección de patrones señala las incongruencias entre el texto biográfico, los intereses y la actividad; la escalada se produce cuando se superan los umbrales de riesgo.

Marco de moderación:

  • Triaje asistido por IA con humanos en el circuito; marcación en tiempo real de contenido que viola las políticas; registros de contexto completos para los revisores; registro de auditoría a prueba de manipulaciones.
  • Controles de seguridad de la comunidad: opción de informe rápido; opciones para bloquear, silenciar o restringir interacciones; bloqueos suaves automatizados tras repetidas infracciones.
  • Canal de apelaciones: los usuarios presentan pruebas; las decisiones se revisan en 24 horas; criterios claros y publicados guían los resultados.

Kit de herramientas de rompehielos honestos:

  1. Valores primero: “Describe un momento en el que un valor fundamental guio una elección.”
  2. Experiencias que moldean las opiniones: “Comparte una experiencia que alteró tu perspectiva sobre las relaciones”.
  3. Preguntas de curiosidad: "¿Qué pregunta le harías a alguien que admiras más?"
  4. Observaciones neutrales: “¿Qué pequeño gesto de otra persona alegró tu día últimamente?”
  5. Encuadre futuro: "¿Dónde esperas estar el año que viene, personal y socialmente?"
Más información Psicología
Inscribirse en el curso