SoulMatcher App

Write an honest profile that includes three specific interests, one clear value, and a direct invitation to start a conversation.

Openers should demand detail: reference a recent read, a travel memory, or a daily habit, and avoid generic greetings that invite minimal replies.

Set a disciplined message cadence: commit to an authentic reply within 24 hours, send a thoughtful follow-up within another 24 hours if interest remains, and prune chats lacking momentum after 48 hours.

Use built-in filters and metrics to refine prompts: track average reply length, response timeund sentiment cues, then adjust prompts monatlich.

Prioritize safety and authenticity with clear photo guidelines, verified details, and a commitment to respectful exchanges that skip empty profiles.

Prompt-driven conversations: tailored questions that reveal values, interests, and communication style

Start with a value-focused prompt: “What three principles guide your daily choices?”

Adopt a prompt library organized by aim: values, interests, communication style; build a four-question routine to surface depth in each area: 1) values, 2) interests, 3) tone, 4) conflict approach.

Values prompts drive honesty. Examples: “Which experience reshaped your view on fairness?” “Which principle would you defend under scrutiny?” “Describe a time you acted on principle even when it created friction.”

Interests prompts reveal what energizes a partner outside routine life. Examples: “What hobby would you pursue this year if time were unlimited?” “Which book or film sparked a new habit?” “Describe a weekend project you would tackle.”

Communication style prompts reveal how someone prefers dialogue. Examples: “When expressing disagreement, what tone helps you stay constructive?” “Do you favor direct messages, phone calls, or face-to-face chats?” “How soon after a plan shifts should you resync on next steps?”

Tip: mix prompts across surfaces: short prompts to guide initial chats, longer prompts to deepen dialogue. Track responses with a simple rubric: depth (0-5), specificity (0-5), emotional clarity (0-5).

Tailor prompts to personality: introverts prefer reflective prompts; extroverts enjoy prompts that invite witty exchange or quick storytelling. Use a cadence: two value prompts, two interest prompts, one style prompt per session. Rotate weekly to avoid stagnation.

Implementation tips: save high-performing prompts into a favorites set, assign tags, and run A/B prompts to surface responses across profiles with similar goals. Collect feedback on flow, adjust wording after each release.

Ethics: secure consent before deep prompts; allow opt-out; keep responses private until both sides consent to visibility; use anonymized data for analytics only.

Key metrics to monitor: target response length 60–120 words per reply; sentiment balance; topic diversity; and the ratio of value-driven prompts to interest prompts. Track completion rate, response quality, and time to first substantive reply. Review weekly and recalibrate prompts toward clearer values alignment, not superficial traits.

Operational cadence: a 10-minute daily prompt sprint, two value prompts, one interest prompt, one style prompt; log outcomes in a simple sheet to guide future prompts.

Values-based profiles and signals: practical indicators to compare compatibility at a glance

Empfehlung: Start with a three-signal snapshot that users can skim in seconds: core values alignment, daily rhythm compatibility, and communication style.

Core values alignment: Look for explicit listing of values such as honesty, respect, autonomy, family priorities, or service orientation. Check for congruence between stated values and demonstrated behavior–e.g., value transparency, punctuality in commitments, and responsiveness to concerns. Score each value 1–5 based on clarity, specificity, and consistency across conversations; treat 4–5 as solid alignment, 2–3 as developing, 1 as misalignment.

Lifestyle compatibility: Compare sleep schedule, work hours, weekend routines, travel willingness. Signals: preference for early riser vs night owl, routine vs spontaneity, cost of living expectations. Use a quick 3-point check: sleep alignment (same wake time within one hour), social cadence (weekly date nights), and travel openness (one international trip per year).

Kommunikationsstil: Assess tone, directness, conflict approach. Indicators: frequency of check-ins, use of calming language, readiness to apologize, how disagreements are framed. Quick scoring: directness 1–5; responsiveness 1–5; conflict approach 1–5.

Trust signals at a glance: Consistency across prompts, scenarios, and responses matters more than a single virtuous sentence. Look for recurring commitments, specific examples, and avoidance of vague terms. Red flags include evasive answers, selective disclosure, or shifting narratives across chats.

Profile construction tips: Include a three-value cluster with a short descriptor for each item, attach a 1–5 scale, and show the average next to the cluster. Example clusters: “Honesty and transparency” with descriptor “consistently clear,” “Autonomy linked with responsibility” descriptor “independent yet accountable,” “Pace of life alignment” descriptor “scheduling compatible.” Use explicit prompts such as: “Describe a situation where you had to compromise on a core value,” “What does a typical weekend look like,” “How do you handle disagreements.” Record scores beside each value to enable quick cross-check.

Safety, authenticity, and engagement tools: verification, moderation, and honest icebreakers

Recommendation: Deploy a layered verification flow combining automated identity checks, liveness signals, and optional human review; display a visible trust score on profile cards; gate sensitive actions behind verified status; provide a transparent appeals process.

Leistungsziele für die erste Einführung umfassen messbare Verbesserungen in drei Bereichen:

• Die von automatisierten Prüfungen erkannten gefälschten Profile sinken innerhalb der ersten drei Monate um 28%.
• Die durchschnittliche Bearbeitungszeit der Moderations-Warteschlange beträgt 6 Stunden; Fälle außerhalb der Arbeitszeiten werden durch Triage mit schneller Eskalation an Menschen bearbeitet.
• Von Nutzern gemeldetes Vertrauen steigt; der mittlere Vertrauenswert steigt um 12 Punkte; die allgemeine Zufriedenheit verbessert sich um 9%.
• Messaging konvertiert nach ehrlichen Aufforderungen, mit einem Anstieg von 18% bei Antworten auf authentische Gesprächsanfänge.

Verifikationsarchitektur:

• Identitätsschicht: Optionale Überprüfung des Personalausweises durch die Regierung, Selfie-Liveness und Gesichtserkennung; Risikokennzeichnungen als niedrig, mittel, hoch; hohes Risiko löst sekundäre Prüfungen oder eine menschliche Überprüfung aus.
• Geräte- und Sitzungsintegrität: Geräte-Fingerprinting, ungewöhnliche Anmeldebenachrichtigungen, Überwachung der Sitzungsstabilität; Anomalien führen zu sicheren Abfragen oder erneuter Authentifizierung.
• Verhaltensanalyse: Mustererkennung kennzeichnet Abweichungen zwischen Bio-Text, Interessen und Aktivität; Eskalation erfolgt, wenn Risikoschwellen überschritten werden.

Moderationsrahmen:

• KI-gestützte Triage mit Mensch-in-the-Loop; Echtzeit-Markierung von Inhalten, die gegen Richtlinien verstoßen; vollständige Kontextprotokolle für Prüfer; manipulationssicherer Audit-Trail.
• Sicherheitskontrollen für die Community: Schnellmeldeoption; Optionen zum Blockieren, Stummschalten oder Einschränken von Interaktionen; automatische Soft-Blocks nach wiederholten Verstößen.
• Beschwerdekanal: Benutzer reichen Beweise ein; Entscheidungen werden innerhalb von 24 Stunden überprüft; klare, veröffentlichte Kriterien leiten die Ergebnisse.

Ehrliches Eisbrecher-Toolkit:

1. Werte zuerst: „Beschreiben Sie einen Moment, in dem ein zentraler Wert eine Entscheidung geleitet hat.“
2. Erfahrungen, die Ansichten prägen: „Teilen Sie eine Erfahrung, die Ihre Perspektive auf Beziehungen verändert hat.“
3. Neugier weckt Fragen: „Welche Frage würden Sie jemandem stellen, den Sie am meisten bewundern?“
4. Neutrale Beobachtungen: „Welche kleine Geste von einer anderen Person hat Ihren Tag in letzter Zeit erhellt?“
5. Zukunftsgestaltung: „Wo hoffen Sie, im nächsten Jahr persönlich und gesellschaftlich zu stehen?